Section 497 (5) Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), AMD of section 302/324/34 murder and attempt to cancel bail, a request for a cross-case in which both persons were at the time and time of the incident. Losing their hands, on the one hand, the two accused were released on bail in the case of inconsistent version, one was given by the complainant and the other by the opposing party, usually section 497 (2). The PC considerations for cancellation of grants and guarantees, based on the further investigations I provided, were quite different from the one that once the bail was granted to the accused, the bail order was doubled. He was extremely strong and have strong grounds to remember. The order of bail was manifestly illegal, false, in fact wrong. Or the accused, who has been granted bail, misused the bail exception, or interfered with the investigation, or tried to tamper with the evidence of the prosecutor or threatened witnesses or engaged in similar activities. However, if one is on one or more grounds, according to the record, the court may, without hesitation, withdraw the extended court's grant of extended bail, considering the request for a cancellation of bail, to either party. Which was sufficient to cancel the bail under certain circumstances in the court's opinion. In case the complainant fails to identify any of the grounds mentioned above, bail cancellation requests are dismissed, in the circumstances
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
