A VII, R 2 Laws of Evidence (10 10 1984), Arts 17, 79 and 80 The trial court did not consider the requirements necessary to prove a financial transaction document to recover the suit. Such a document was incorporated under Article 17 of the Convention of Martyrdom. , 1984 Laws and Testimony Articles 17 and 79 of 1984, the trial court did not consider that only a minor witness was considered and the reason for not examining or presenting another witness Nothing is available on the record for. Through Article 80 of the Law of Martyrdom, the trial court was asked to consider this aspect and other errors because the common question of law and fact was involved in both competing suits, so the trial court held that both the sessions consisted of stable and stable cases. Was fully qualified. Avoid Controversial Decisions The trial court could not independently decide the question of considering a sale on the issue which allows the appeal to the High Court, and the trial court holding the wrong decisions and orders passed in both suits aside. Decide to send to.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
