Sections 392 and 34 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 7 (a) and (c) were executed in response to the planned bank robbery evidence that the accused's award was charged. He committed a robbery in a bank and in the process, two men were shot and killed, although the accused committed the crime by stabbing them in the face, but the witnesses were still wearing special clothing and weapons. As they were introduced into their possession, the prosecution's witnesses testified to each other and they permanently attributed the role to each. The statements of all the prosecution witnesses were fully linked to the commission of the crime, and they told the story in a natural way when the prosecution witnesses were specifically identified by the accused coming out of the bank and later prosecuted. Other witnesses from An accused was arrested, no question of misidentification arose, no holding of the identity parade, no misconduct could be charged against the witnesses for falsely involving the accused in the present case. , Admits that an FIR was filed after an hour's delay, but the facts and circumstances are the same as the incident was justified, as soon as after the incident, a written request for an FIR registration was made to Lewes. Was sent and at this time the suspects have not been identified, although the vacancy and the weapons of the crime will be sent for examination two months later. Was, but the forensic science were the weapons used in the commission of a crime lab report medical evidence to support the prosecution's case c
