ATLAS CABLES (PVT.) LTD. versus QUETTA ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY LTD.
The blacklisting of the Constitution Petition Contractor of Arts 18 and 1991 was the body of applicant electric cables and conductors, etc. The applicant was blacklisted due to breach of contract and failure to deliver material on time, which was because there were no reasons for the need for blacklisting and the blacklisting letter The circulation violated the fundamental right of legal business through Article 18 of the Constitution, which was relied upon by both parties. Blacklisting, deleting and banning of blacklisting firms could only be resorted to when no document was filed only after obtaining the approval of the registration committee officials so that the applicant could be shown. A registration committee was formed to consider the blacklist and it provided the applicant with a hearing. The letter for blacklisting the applicant does not fall into any of the categories listed in the registration procedure for registration of the passport order issued by the authorities for the reasons for blacklisting. The extreme action of the blacklisting applicant effectively prevented him from running his legal business and would result in the applicant being dismissed from the business. Such action by the authorities violated the fundamental rights of doing business legally through Article 18 of the Constitution and also violated their own registration. Hearing of the rule The High Court has termed the letter issued by the authorities with constitutional jurisdiction as illegal and illegal.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2011
