Sections 302 (b), 147 and 148 sought to establish the connection of the evidence with the accused by the prosecution's witnesses, who were very close to each other and hated the accused, saying there were no witnesses. Evidence affecting trust cannot be relied upon, especially in the context of their interrelationships and their contradictory prescriptions, especially without independent co-operation. Neither of the tarnished evidence can be substantiated by another piece of tarnished evidence, in which, in the case of the alleged indictment of the prosecution's witnesses, as a result of the weak evidence, the extra-judicial confession made by the accused person , The basis for the conviction cannot be established, unless there is any other concrete evidence that should be cleared of any instability, which was found in these circumstances. Be reliable The witnesses disclosed the names of the accused only five days after the incident. After the suspects on the night of the incident, they could quickly reveal the names of the accused. Otherwise, the alleged confession of the accused was extravagant in the extra-judicial confession evidence presented by the crime. And no credible evidence could be relied upon in all the identification parades because the prosecution had no benefit because on the one hand, both witnesses dismissed that they could not identify the culprits because of the darkness. ? At the dead hours of the night, but on the other hand, identifying the accused as the culprit, not only did the accused testify first, but were also named by oath, medical evidence five days after the alleged incident. Were here
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2011
