Section 394/34 Volunteering for committing robbery Appreciating the evidence was not an eyewitness to the occasion, but it did report the incident in the presence of a witness and other female witnesses of the incident. FIR, but it was alleged that two persons riding a motorcycle snatched the golden ear of the affected woman and injured her. The accused was later arrested and the alleged identity parade after his arrest. It was also included in the lawsuit. She was identified by the victim when the prosecution witness failed to make a physical appearance and did not say any other details of the accused, the prosecutor's witness said during the investigation by the investigating officer. No witnesses, both witnesses failed to describe the physical description, color, height and other identifying characteristics of the accused parade lost its identity value, thus it was not cared for, the circumstances alleged. But after his arrest, the disclosure was made by the accused, but it was an established fact No new fact was not discovered, nor was he rude substances on the basis of the disclosure. Recovery disclosure that was not otherwise established was of no use, nor could the reliance on witnesses' statements be modified and improved, and the trial court failed to consider the contradictions appearing in the witness statements. The relevant law was not appreciated by the trial court, which did not make its order sustainable, the prosecution's case was doubtful
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2011
