Sections 9 (c), 20, 21 and 29 Prohibited (Enforcement) Order (4 of 1979), Arts 3 and 4 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 (e) Drug possession, manufacturing prohibition and ownership. The evidence of intoxicating and unlicensed weapons was appreciated in the raids around 10pm, there was no possibility of obtaining a search warrant because an emergency was mentioned in the FIR for raids. Otherwise the Narcotic Substances Act Section 21, 1997, provided the officer with the authority to enter, search and arrest without a warrant. And in accordance with the nature of Section 20 of this Act, its non-compliance cannot be construed as a strong basis that the trial of the accused is bad in the eyes of the law, the prosecution's testimony fully consistent. And there was no contradiction in their statements in this regard. The accused was supposed to be in possession and possession of drugs under Section 29 of the Drug Substances Control Act 1997 for the recovery of opiates from Bytek, unless the contrary was proved, under the Act on the charge of violating the accused. A crime will be committed. In the present case, the refusal was unsuccessful, during the trial, the defense's defense was rotating and the objection of the accused's lawyer to the analysis report was also ambiguous as the report was issued by a federal government analyst, The sealed parcel of the suspected material charge against the accused was received because there was a call by the accused and there was no error or unlawful action that the application found in the same accused failed to prove that The anti-narcotic force def
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2011
