32, 33, 34 and 198 of the Control of the Narcotic Substance Act (XXV of 1997), Section 9 (c) of the Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 199 and 45 of the Constitutional Petitions convictions, reduced the special pardon by the trial court Applicant convicted and sentenced. Suffering for 14 years \ RI Appellate Court on appeal reduced the 14 year sentence to 10 years and the rest of the sentence was upheld. During the approval of the appeal, President Pakistan gave a "special amnesty" within the limits of convicted prisoners. One of the total convictions sentenced by the petitioner / offender from the court has claimed that at that time, when he was apologized by the president, when his sentence was 14 years, he was sentenced to 14 years imprisonment. Was entitled to a small discount on his own. Jail rejected her request that the trial court's grant of justification granted to the applicant be final, when it was not challenged in the higher forum, while in the present case, the appeal was challenged. The final decision of the last higher forum / appellate court, with its variations, if any, will be considered as punishment, the appellate court reduced the sentence to 14 years from the applicant's request and applied. Co was not pressing his appeal on the merit, which would mean that he could vary the amount of the sentence by the trial court. Accepted the sentence with less deduction, the final sentence of the applicants was 10 years, unless different from 14 years, through the higher forum. The punishment is reduced from 14 years to 10 years, followed by 10 years imprisonment. Once the sentence is finalized, the applicant once waived his minimum sentence of 10 years
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2011
