Section 2 302 (b) Qatil Amad has defined the evidence as witnessed by the prosecution witness, who is the accused's real sister and the widow of the accused, because there was no question of wrongful identification in this case. Was. The victim was shot to death as a result of her husband's death on the night of the incident, saying that the witness was a natural witness and there was no prejudice to the accused being falsely accused. The presence of a witness on the occasion cannot be doubted. His statement was reinforced in the material aspects with statements from other prosecution witnesses whose statements were not examined in multiple examinations, the wounds on the victim's body were confirmed by an independent location witness. , Her witness confirmed the recovery of two more persons. From the Kalashnikov incident, blood stains to the ground as well as the blood stains of the deceased and it supported all the restoration memorandum involved in the trial under Section 302, PPC. In particular, there was an unusual event in which the same suspect was initially involved in the nomination of an FIR and where the parties were linked to each other because of a close relationship, the accused supported the request. I presented two witnesses. Alibi, but said that witnesses did not formally confirm the defendant's statement on the evidence of the defense was not consistent with Alibi's plea and that defense witnesses affected by the trust were able to make a case in the prosecution's case. Were accused of failing to prove Alibaba's plea at trial, to no avail.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2011
