Article 2 302 ()) and Q 34 Definition of AMD Evidence Testimony of two witnesses of a joint intention who were not only independent but also residents of the same village, where the incident occurred, were not witnesses. The FIR mentions that there was some dispute between the parties on the ground that the accused and the deceased were close relatives and that the civil war had caused matters to dissolve in the family, when the incident occurred, both witnesses fully The unwanted witnesses were shown and did not disclose any interference of any kind, which is listed on the victim's statement, assigning the accused a special role in front of the police officer at the hospital. Had given details of the incident. To be treated as a dying declaration, which was fully proved by other pieces of evidence, the dying declaration, although there was no solid piece of evidence. , But can be used as a contentious piece of evidence in support of the ocular account presented by witnesses, though he did not cause the victim, but he was able to arm his partner with a pistol at the scene of the crime. Brought and fired at the accused that after the incident, the accused snatched his partner, who was involved in the murder of the accused, the conduct of the accused was no less than fully involved in attracting Section 34 of the PPC. Was together, and went along, leaving no room. As to the suspicion of a joint intent to cause the murder of someone killed, it was learned that the shooting, which in such a situation, would be of major importance once it was proved that one of the causes Injuries from
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2011
