Articles 4 and 5 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 7 and 27 of testimony relating to the possession of explosives and the operation of terrorism, were presented at 2 pm (night) and it was not possible for a private witness to be involved. Was. As was the case during odd hours of night records, attempts were made to attach private witnesses, but no item was available. The defense failed to bring any material on record so that police could make false allegations against the witnesses. To prove the rebellion or the intent of the charge. The defendants cannot be prosecuted in any way if they are not connected to private circumstances because the police officers were competent witnesses and they could be tracked, as long as they were malicious to an innocent person. False witnesses who are not accused should not be exposed. The appointment of a lawyer for the accused for noncompliance with the commission of an offense for illegal purposes, section 103, CR PC, H, without any power record, reveals that the prosecution witness, who was a member of the investigative team, Submitted a report / expert opinion provided by Crisis Management Officer. And it was never objected to by the defense lawyer at the time of its appearance; the objection raised by the accused in connection with the submission of the expert's report was of no use, in the special possession of the accused. Nothing was brought to the record to show that the seizure of ammunition from the house / rooms was established, or to show that the prosecution's witnesses had any evil, perverse or illicit desire against the accused persons. Was, on trial, this
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2011
