Sections 302, 34 and 316 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 345 Quaid-e-Azam, proceedings made by several persons in the presentation of the joint will, were compromised by the power of the majority party and the Court of Power. On the basis of the agreement filed to acquit him, the final result of the settlement between the parties found during the approval of the appeal was that the accused person was not acquitted by the court before such a settlement was made. It was, of course, obligatory to look deeply into the matter to make sure. The compromise was in accordance with the relevant provisions of the law. 345 (2), under the CCPC, the court was empowered to increase the offenses mentioned in the present case, by the legal heirs of the victim, the accused / offender. Was forgiven while a state raised objections to the settlement / offender / offender was acquitted of the crime
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2011
