Find a Lawyer

GUL WALI versus GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. THROUGH SECRETARY LOCAL COUNCIL BOARD, PESHAWAR

Section 4 Constitution Pakistan, Article 212 (3) Applicants terminating service application who were recruited as personal assistants, during which they were not paid salaries and compensation during their employment, they resolved their grievances. Contacted the service tribunal for. The petitioner requested for relief, he declared that his appointment was illegal and invalid and consequently his services were terminated even after the advice of the authorities stated that the service tribunal had made the request. There was no jurisdiction to terminate the customer's services. An agreement has been made to set aside the illegal and unknown decision. And the matter will be returned to the department. The application was converted into an appeal and a provisional decree was made that the applicant / appellant would be considered to be in permanent service and his right to pay for the period in which he served in the department. Were given, will be addressed. By authorized authority

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• MUHAMMAD RAMZAN v. GHULAM QADIR 2011 SCMR 659
• MOULA BUX LEGHARI v. ADDITIONAL INSPECTOR-GENERAL (AIGP) ESTABLISHMENT, REGIONAL POLICE OFFICER, HYDERABAD 2011 PLC(CS) 660
• ABDUL KARIM BURINO v. DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT PAKISTAN RAILWAYS 2011 PLC(CS) 661
• KHALID MEHMOOD v. State 2011 SCMR 664
• ANWAR ALI KHAN v. D.G. FIA 2011 PLC(CS) 669
• GUL MUHAMMAD v. State 2011 SCMR 670
• Syed MAZHAR HAIDER KAZMI v. SECRETARY AGRICULTURE, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, LAHORE 2011 PLC(CS) 671
• SINDH HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION through Secretary v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice, Islamabad 2011 PLD 671

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

top advocate from Shangla lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes