Find a Lawyer

KHALID MEHMOOD versus STATE

During the review of the evidence in section 302 (b), there was an old enmity between the parties when it was immediately reported to the police. The accused did not deny or deny the criminal case between the parties and in the absence of motive. Murder can also be committed. The usual punishment for verifying the murder was in the absence of a death sentence. Accelerator testimony, retrieval of the crime weapon, positive report from the firearm specialist, motions and medical evidence led to the prosecution's trial against the accused and the defendants were sentenced. Maintained in the conditions

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• LAL KHAN v. MUHAMMAD YOUSAF 2011 PLD 657
• MUHAMMAD RAMZAN v. GHULAM QADIR 2011 SCMR 659
• MOULA BUX LEGHARI v. ADDITIONAL INSPECTOR-GENERAL (AIGP) ESTABLISHMENT, REGIONAL POLICE OFFICER, HYDERABAD 2011 PLC(CS) 660
• ABDUL KARIM BURINO v. DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT PAKISTAN RAILWAYS 2011 PLC(CS) 661
• GUL WALI v. GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. through Secretary Local Council Board, Peshawar 2011 PLC(CS) 666
• ANWAR ALI KHAN v. D.G. FIA 2011 PLC(CS) 669
• GUL MUHAMMAD v. State 2011 SCMR 670
• Syed MAZHAR HAIDER KAZMI v. SECRETARY AGRICULTURE, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, LAHORE 2011 PLC(CS) 671

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

ask a advocate free from Dera Bugti lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes