Find a Lawyer

GUL MUHAMMAD versus STATE

Section 2?b (b) Conan's Testimony (1984) of the ten), Section 40 Delay in filing the FIR was properly explained by the complainant, the father of the deceased child being the complainant. And the accused was a close relative who was accused of wanting and avoiding illness. The complainant, since he considered the complainant responsible for separation from his wife and daughters, and was thus thought to teach him a lesson. He was taken to a bicycle, then killed and thrown into the river. All the relevant information that the accused only knew about was that the accused had brutally and cruelly killed an innocent child and did not deserve any relaxation Appeal was rejected in the circumstances.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• ABDUL KARIM BURINO v. DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT PAKISTAN RAILWAYS 2011 PLC(CS) 661
• KHALID MEHMOOD v. State 2011 SCMR 664
• GUL WALI v. GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. through Secretary Local Council Board, Peshawar 2011 PLC(CS) 666
• ANWAR ALI KHAN v. D.G. FIA 2011 PLC(CS) 669
• Syed MAZHAR HAIDER KAZMI v. SECRETARY AGRICULTURE, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, LAHORE 2011 PLC(CS) 671
• SINDH HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION through Secretary v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice, Islamabad 2011 PLD 671
• FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs, Islama v. Dr. MUBASHIR HASSAN 2011 PLD 674
• Dr. MUHAMMAD SHAHID MIAN v. FAIZ-UR-REHMAN FAIZI 2011 PLD 676

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

inheritance advocates near Jalozai lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes