Find a Lawyer

MOULA BUX LEGHARI versus ADDITIONAL INSPECTOR-GENERAL (AIGP) ESTABLISHMENT, REGIONAL POLICE OFFICER, HYDERABAD

Article 212 ()) The jurisdiction of the Tribunal of the trial court to maintain the dispute regarding the applicant's date of birth is limited to questions only for the law of public importance and the determination of controversial questions of fact. Not The petition found a merit, which would have been otherwise banned over time and there was no reasonable explanation so that the delay could be justified dismissed.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION, CBR/FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE, ISLAMABAD v. GUL MUHAMMAD 2011 PLC(CS) 651
• MUHAMMAD SHAUKAT v. ZARAI TARAQIATI BANK LTD. (ZTBL) 2011 PLC(CS) 656
• LAL KHAN v. MUHAMMAD YOUSAF 2011 PLD 657
• MUHAMMAD RAMZAN v. GHULAM QADIR 2011 SCMR 659
• ABDUL KARIM BURINO v. DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT PAKISTAN RAILWAYS 2011 PLC(CS) 661
• KHALID MEHMOOD v. State 2011 SCMR 664
• GUL WALI v. GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. through Secretary Local Council Board, Peshawar 2011 PLC(CS) 666
• ANWAR ALI KHAN v. D.G. FIA 2011 PLC(CS) 669

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

criminal advocate from Nilore lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes