O XXXVII, RR 1 and 2 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 185 (3) Recovery Promise Note Note The trial was filed in favor of the plaintiff in the non-recording trial of the concession leave evidence while discharged after the trial. The trial was held. The trial court considered the pro-notes and receipts executed in favor of the plaintiff and brought it to the record, so it cannot be said that the trial court did not apply its mind to the trial case or That the verdict was decided without trial. The evidence was within the sole discretion of the trial court to grant leave to defend the conditional litigation, therefore, the trial court's ruling in this regard was absolutely legal and could not be challenged by the defendants. The trial court's directive reviewed the delivery of guaranteed bonds but they were not complied with. The trial court rightly dismissed the defendant's pleas by the courts seeking leave for defense. Failing to identify any irregularities or weaknesses in the decisions passed, the court below refused to interfere with the decisions passed by the courts, which refused to appeal in favor of the plaintiff.
