SUO MOTU CASE NO.24 OF 2010 AND HUMAN RIGHTS CASES NOS. 57701-P, 57719-G, 57754-P, 58152-P, 59036-S, versus
Section 14 Estacode, Volume 1 (Eden 2007) Directions In the present case, employment after retirement record, has shown that the employment of retired civil servants / persons in the police department is subject to the provisions of law, section 14 of the Civil Servants Act, 1973. As well as re-employment, the guidelines contained in the Esta Code, Volume I, Eden, 2007, and the decisions of the High Courts on the matter were not considered, nor did the rule of law and the formation of the Constitution. So it was important. That the letter and spirit of the relevant provisions be strictly adhered to, otherwise it would not be possible to provide an effective machinery to ensure law and order, especially in the Police Police Department, so that peace in the country at the same time. In order to avoid violating relevant provisions of the law that prevented the development of officers who also served in the military and were waiting for their promotion. Opportunities were not already available as the retired officers were given a re-employment / contract which was not only in the police department but also in order to achieve good governance. The same principle should be followed and strictly applied in other departments. The Supreme Court observed that the Attorney General will take the matter to the Government / Authorized Authority so that if any mistake is made, necessary steps should be taken to rectify it. Issue an order to the Secretary, the Establishment Division, and the Chief Secretaries of the provinces to ensure that if any public servant or other person who has been employed has been subject to the provisions of this case.
