Find a Lawyer

SHEHRI-CBE versus CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT, KARACHI

Application for leave to appeal to Article 185 (3) Supreme Court. The real controversy was the land applicants' view that 2 million residents of the area were to be used underground for recreational facilities. At any conclusion, the application for leave to appeal can be appealed for decision on a recognized default judgment and cannot be equated with the proceedings in the case which results from the findings of the case after examining the evidence. Attracts completely different recording methods. Supreme Court denies interference in decision The appeal was denied by the High Court

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• SUO MOTU CASE NO.24 OF 2010 AND HUMAN RIGHTS CASES NOS. 57701-P, 57719-G, 57754-P, 58152-P, 59036-S, 2011 PLD 277
• ANJUMAN FRUIT ARHTIAN v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, FAISALABAD 2011 SCMR 279
• DAOUD SHAMI v. EMIRATES AIRLINES 2011 PLD 282
• MUHAMMAD BUX (decd) through Legal Heirs v. ARMY WELFARE TRUST 2011 SCMR 284
• BASHIR AHMED v. ROOTS SCHOOL NETWORK through Administrator/owner 2011 SCMR 290
• SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION, CBR/FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE, ISLAMABAD v. GUL MUHAMMAD 2011 SCMR 295
• PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES CORPORATION v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, EMPLOYEES OLD-AGE BENEFITS 2011 PLC 295
• Hafiz TASSADUQ HUSSAIN v. LAL KHATOON 2011 PLD 296

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

us immigration advocates from Jehanian lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes