Find a Lawyer

ANJUMAN FRUIT ARHTIAN versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, FAISALABAD

Arts 199 and 185 (3) Constitutional jurisdiction of High Court jurisdiction Disputes Questionnaire In fact fraud and fraud applicants banned the High Court's order in exercising constitutional jurisdiction over fraud and forgery. Was. The parties are seeking constitutional jurisdiction to establish a clear legal right that should go beyond any doubt and dispute; in the light of alleged fraud and fraud, the legal rights and privileges of the applicants were disputed, the constitutional jurisdiction I could not decide the disputed questions. It refused, refusing to exercise its constitutional jurisdiction over disputed questions of law and facts, which could only be resolved on the basis of evidence which could not be entered into the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction. Permission was denied

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• SUPREME COURT BAR ASSOCIATION through Secretary v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2011 PLD 269
• JUSTICE HASNAT AHMED KHAN v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN/STATE 2011 PLD 274
• SHAFI MUHAMMAD SAAND v. GOVERNMENT OF SINDH 2011 SCMR 276
• SUO MOTU CASE NO.24 OF 2010 AND HUMAN RIGHTS CASES NOS. 57701-P, 57719-G, 57754-P, 58152-P, 59036-S, 2011 PLD 277
• DAOUD SHAMI v. EMIRATES AIRLINES 2011 PLD 282
• MUHAMMAD BUX (decd) through Legal Heirs v. ARMY WELFARE TRUST 2011 SCMR 284
• SHEHRI-CBE v. CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT, KARACHI 2011 SCMR 287
• BASHIR AHMED v. ROOTS SCHOOL NETWORK through Administrator/owner 2011 SCMR 290

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

solicitors from Gadoon Amazai lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes