Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD BUX (DECD) THROUGH LEGAL HEIRS versus ARMY WELFARE TRUST

Article 117 The plaintiffs claim that they have a preferential right to allot the suit land because their tenant claims that they are the tenant of the suit land. Two of the plaintiffs were brothers and the other two were the sons of the first plaintiff, whose evidence is not stated. The only word in which one of his brothers was a tenant of the suit was the verbal version of the first plaintiff was not endorsed by any document or other oral evidence, the plaintiff's oral version was denied by the plaintiff: The plaintiffs failed to file a case in their favor. Conditions

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• SHAFI MUHAMMAD SAAND v. GOVERNMENT OF SINDH 2011 SCMR 276
• SUO MOTU CASE NO.24 OF 2010 AND HUMAN RIGHTS CASES NOS. 57701-P, 57719-G, 57754-P, 58152-P, 59036-S, 2011 PLD 277
• ANJUMAN FRUIT ARHTIAN v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, FAISALABAD 2011 SCMR 279
• DAOUD SHAMI v. EMIRATES AIRLINES 2011 PLD 282
• SHEHRI-CBE v. CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT, KARACHI 2011 SCMR 287
• BASHIR AHMED v. ROOTS SCHOOL NETWORK through Administrator/owner 2011 SCMR 290
• SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION, CBR/FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE, ISLAMABAD v. GUL MUHAMMAD 2011 SCMR 295
• PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES CORPORATION v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, EMPLOYEES OLD-AGE BENEFITS 2011 PLC 295

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

tax advocates from More kunda lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes