EJAZ AKBAR KASI versus MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND BROADCASTING
The applicants (employees of Pakistan Television on contract basis) were drafted under Articles 184 (3), 9 and 25 of the Constitution under Article 184 (3), 9 and 25 of the Constitution to instruct the organization to discharge its services. Protect the period of The organization has been performing more than satisfactorily over the past ten years, and therefore, their case was explicitly covered under Article 9 of the Constitution. It was further pointed out that some resource persons whose names were mentioned, who had joined the organization after the applicants were appointed, and even after they were juniors of the applicants, their services were regular. Was made in which it was expressly stated that Article 25 of the Constitution was violated, there is no doubt that in order to regularize the service, it should be prepared by the policy organization in relation to such employees, But at the same time, it is important to keep in mind that there should be no discrimination and discrimination. Who were on contract basis for more than 10 years etc. deserved to consider regularization as they were working against the existing sanctioned vacancies for which budget allocation was also made annually. The Board of Directors was paid on a regular basis. The organization may not have refused to regularize applicants, however, it was a fact that regulating MPAs had to rely on the petitioners' performance if it were to make all, in the present case, qualify the test. And their performance is also to the extent that it is clear that for the last 10 years he has not been without
