JAVED IQBAL versus EMPLOYEES\' OLD-AGE BENEFITS INSTITUTION, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN
Section 4 and 17 employees \ Old Age Benefit Act (XIV of 1976), Section 4, 6, 7, 17, 18, 19, 44 and 45 employees \ old age benefits (Board of Trustees) Rules, 1977, R 6 employees \ Old Age Benefit (Investment) Rules, 1979, Arrears 3 (h) (i), 4 (1) (h) and 5 Constitutions for Acquisition of Residential Bungalows for Pakistan, Arts 24, 185 (3) and 1998 Regional Office Notification Employees to retain the acquisition process by the Commissioner due to a lawsuit filed by the EOBI for the specific performance of the sale agreement on the sale of such bungalow plant by the Old Age Benefit Institution (EOBI) civil court. Order of the Commissioner of OBI Not challenged by Bangladesh was appointed by the High Court in a constitutional petition filed by the EOBI Validity Employees Old Age Benefits (Investment) Rules 1979 for the purchase or acquisition of immovable property, obliged to show that such capital There was extra money to work because employees do not need to spend under the Old Age. Benefits Act, 1976; and that such investment has not exceeded the limit laid down under R4 (1) of the Employees Old Age Benefit (Investment) Rules 1979, nothing is available on record For such a purchase or acquisition, EOBI had obtained the approval of either its board or the government. Or any budget allocated and approved according to which the meetings held on record only held negotiations between the parties on the proposal for the purchase of such bungalow, but with the necessary approvals or pricing or closing agreements between the parties. Employees \ Old Age Benefit Institution was not related to such minutes
