Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHARIF versus CHIEF SECRETARY

The complaint about the retirement age of the R-12 employee was that his retirement date was mistakenly taken from the seniority list, the public servant gave birth to his secondary school certificate, computerized national ID card and service book verification date. Depending on your date of birth according to history. The government employee mentioned in the service book cannot be ignored because it is the most authoritative document. No date of birth can be found in seniority list, date of birth in service book SC accepts date of birth of public servant in secondary School certificate, computerized national identity card and service book SC for leave to appeal Appeal to amend request and leave government employee's retirement notification separate

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• SECRETARY, MINISTARY OF LAW, PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS AND HUMAN RIGHTS, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB v. MUHAMMAD ASHRAF KHAN 2011 PLD 7
• MUHAMMAD ISLAM v. INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, ISLAMABAD 2011 SCMR 8
• PAKISTAN SYNTHETICS LIMITED v. WAQAR AHMED 2011 SCMR 11
• HUMAN RIGHTS CASE NO.1356-P 2011 PLD 17
• EJAZ AKBAR KASI v. MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND BROADCASTING 2011 PLD 22
• ABDUL GHAFOOR v. State 2011 SCMR 23
• JAVED IQBAL v. EMPLOYEES\' OLD-AGE BENEFITS INSTITUTION, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN 2011 PLD 26
• MIR SAHIB JAN v. JANAN 2011 SCMR 27

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

online advocate from Pindi Bhattian lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes