Section 2 (c) (C) Qatil Ahmed, after examining the evidence, re-examined the evidence on record, dismissed the ocular evidence for good reasons, as mentioned and highlighted in the statement of facts. The witnesses did not mention the names of witnesses in their statement at the relevant time eyewitnesses were not present on the occasion, their statements were properly ignored that the ocular evidence was denied. 302 (b), the PPC was granted the opportunity to change the sentence of the accused. S, according to his statement under section 342, CC pysyd decision was to exclude any appeal to or faced legal action. R \ n
