Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ISLAM versus INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, ISLAMABAD

Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 212 (3) Before the jurisdiction of the appellate court, the appeal was dismissed by the public servant, ignoring the fact that there was no revision clause nor any amendment filed. It should be noted that the appeal filed by the public servant was withheld over time, and accordingly the preliminary appeal could not be heard within the service tribunal. A timely question has been reviewed by the Service Tribunal as to the extent of the law, and no unlawful interference or interference with the service tribunal's order of appeal can be identified.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Director-General, Ministry of Interior, Islamabad v. FARHEEN RASHID 2011 SCMR 1
• MUHAMMAD ISLAM v. INSPECTOR-GENERAL, ISLAMABAD 2011 PLC(CS) 1
• Mian NAJIBUDDIN OAWAISI v. AAMIR YAR 2011 PLD 1
• SECRETARY, MINISTARY OF LAW, PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS AND HUMAN RIGHTS, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB v. MUHAMMAD ASHRAF KHAN 2011 PLD 7
• PAKISTAN SYNTHETICS LIMITED v. WAQAR AHMED 2011 SCMR 11
• HUMAN RIGHTS CASE NO.1356-P 2011 PLD 17
• MUHAMMAD SHARIF v. CHIEF SECRETARY 2011 SCMR 21
• EJAZ AKBAR KASI v. MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND BROADCASTING 2011 PLD 22

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

jobs for advocates from Pishin lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes