Section 302 (b) Qatil Um obtained the remand of the case for not conducting cross-examination on eyewitnesses, both the witnesses appearing in the case were not examined and the High Court confirmed the death sentence. The accused was also held responsible. The primary responsibility of the court was to make sure that fact was investigated and the accused brought to justice. Even after several postponements, if the lawyer for the accused was not present in the court, either the trial court He could have provided a defense lawyer at a government expense or given him a last chance to make an alternative arrangement; the trial court did not adopt the above course and instead asked the witnesses to be examined by witnesses himself. Had to do that for which he neither got the required skills nor was he ready to do so, authorized by the trial court. Row method to reflect the justice of abortion and as a result was the conviction of the accused and the case. After giving the accused an opportunity to examine two eyewitnesses, he was sent to the trial court to decide the case, according to which the appeal was settled.
