Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHARIF versus CHIEF SECRETARY

The complaint about the retirement age of the R-12 employee was that his retirement date was mistakenly taken from the seniority list, the public servant gave birth to his secondary school certificate, computerized national ID card and service book verification date. Depending on your date of birth according to history. The government employee mentioned in the service book cannot be ignored because it is the most authoritative document. The date of birth cannot be given in the seniority list which is mentioned in the service book. Certificate, Computerized National Identity Card and Service Book The Supreme Court changed the application for leave to appeal and the appeal for the separation of government employee's retirement notification was allowed.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• ABDUL GHAFOOR v. State 2011 SCMR 23
• JAVED IQBAL v. EMPLOYEES\' OLD-AGE BENEFITS INSTITUTION, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN 2011 PLD 26
• MIR SAHIB JAN v. JANAN 2011 SCMR 27
• ABDUR REHMAN alias BOOTA v. State 2011 SCMR 34
• H.R. CASES NOS.16360 OF 2009, 1859-S & 14292-P OF 2010 2011 PLD 37
• MUHAMMAD ZAHIR alias TIKO v. State 2011 SCMR 38
• PAKCOM LIMITED v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2011 PLD 44
• MUSHTAQ HUSSAIN v. State 2011 SCMR 45

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

when you need a advocate from Dijkot lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes