ALI MURAD versus NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN THROUGH BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Section 1 (4), Provo & Section 0 12 (3) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Section 25A Bank (Nationwide) Act (XIX of 1974), Section 5 National Bank of Pakistan Ordinance (XIX of 1949), Section 3 and 12 of the Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968 apply to the provisions of section 1 (4) of the Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968, employed in the National Bank of Pakistan's Scope Provo. Is. An Industrial and Commercial Establishment, which was governed by or under the authority of the Federal or any Provincial Government and contained legal rules, the Standing Order Ordinance, 1968, shall not apply to banks, followed by nationalization. had lived. The federal government, but the respondent (National Bank of Pakistan), which was a law firm and a corporate body founded by a constitution, was not a national worker who had finished the work o Be an employee, industrial relations ordinance. , Would cease to be a worker for the purpose of 1969 and could not refer to the Labor Court under Section 25A of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, however, if that person was an employee as described in the Standing Order Ordinance, 1968 and Claiming infringement of his rights under Standing Order 12 (3) of this Ordinance, he can refer to Labor Court, Industrial Relations Order Ordinance, not on the basis of Article 25 of 1969, but on the basis of standing order 12 (3). Order Ordinance, 1968 Even if the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 did not apply, but the Standing Ordinance Ordinance, 1968, applied to workers whose ordinance violated the right under Standing Order 12 (3) of 1968. Was done, then they can refer. Labor Court gender
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
