AL-ARFAN ELECTRONICS TRADING L.L.C. THROUGH AUTHORIZED PERSON versus STATE
Interim Invoice Inspector after investigating the matter using Section 2 (d) Fraud Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 420, 468, 471, 34 and 109 as fraudulent documents, fraudulent documents and forged documents. Return of FIA, Interim Invoice before the (Special Court) (Crimes in connection with the banks) Then, the Investigation Officer applied for the return of the challan on the basis that after the investigation was completed, Also, the banker was not found involved in any crime commission that falls within the scope of business affairs. The bank's request was accepted and the special court returned the challan that it was a matter of discovery and export and that the court had no jurisdiction to entertain the matter as it was not considered in the terms of the Scheduled Crime. Used to come Ordinance of the Banks (Special Courts), 1984 Special Court directed the prosecution in the circumstances under the provisions of the Crimes Act. The court, which had jurisdiction to bring the case to trial. Of the eight respondents, only one was a banking company, which was not a party to the proceedings. The remaining respondents were private parties, which were in the Ordinance of the Banks (Special Courts). In 1984, a respondent and / or his employees and officers were best applied if they were prosecuted for damages in connection with the banking business, against the aforementioned defendant. And there was no specific name available. The FIR or the challan against which the scheduled offense under section 2 (d) of the Ordinance can be made a crime under question
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
