PAKISTAN INDUSTRIAL CREDIT AND INVESTMENT CORPORATION LTD. versus KHAIRPUR SUGAR MILLS LIMITED
Sections 18 and 19 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Sections 2 (2), 12 (2) and OXXIII, R 3, the separate principles of compromise and agreement are dealt with by the contracting parties and by the court. If the agreement is successfully rejected by the source, then almost the ails always fail, but it is possible to attack the decree without compromising the agreement, so it is not necessary for them to go to other fields. To be challenged on one side, and the contract on the other, can attack the authorities, but it is different, it can be As Spelling, a challenge is made by the order, will be carefully examined to challenge the matter and to take into account the distinction between order and agreement. If a compromise case is challenged on the basis of a misrepresentation, it must be clear, whether the attack was made against the contract or the agreement is easy if the scope of sections 18 and 19 of the Contract Act 1872 And, on the other hand, if the agreement can be settled under section 12 (2), CPC, it can be proved wrong on the basis of contract and misrepresentation.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
