FAYSAL BANK LIMITED versus DEWAN TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED
Sections 9 and 10 left the bank loan recovery to defend this legal defense and the crucial question of fact, the defendant's recording claims that the facility was paid for and paid under the Marabah Finance Agreement. No money was provided and the forced TR was paid by the defendant. Legally deferred documents show that the original amount under the matrimonial finance agreement was Rs 150,000,000 and its resale value was Rs 154,974,658, therefore, for the first time, the claimant 9 768,164, which was not entitled to profit, which was not a plausible explanation available to the plaintiff as to what amount was actually paid and payable under the Forced TR, if non-refundable documents. And compare the data in the contract to the application, which was a request and agreement for non-refundable documents, which shows that The forced TR was made $ 776,026 24 if it was calculated at US $ 62 of 30 (in contrast to the relay conversion rate), which came in at $ 48,346,435, the plaintiff stated. The defendant paid Rs 51,184,543 for such forced TR, which also required reconciliation through the evidence in which all such contradictions arising out of the defendant had arisen. The yellow of important questions of law and facts and required evidence, and to prove the case, the leave was indispensable and it was approved.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
