Section 65 Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 Civil Procedure Code (Amendment) Ordinance (X of 1980), Section 15 High Court Appeal Receipt of Invalid Contract Amount, Payment of Plaintiff's Tenant in the Defendant's Own Shop And was expelled. According to the law, a single High Court judge dismissed the case on the ground that the terms of the rent were not maintained under the rent rules, if the restriction system was not yet practiced, this was confirmed by leading evidence in the suit. Could not be done In the marketplace, where the shop was located or whether Peggy was welcomed by the shop's defendant's father, a single High Court judge believed that as Pagiri was in line with the rent rules, so was the issue. Can't be hot. It was held that under section 65 of the Contract Act, 1872, it was the duty of the defendants to pay the defendant the benefit received under the banned contract (receiving a salary) to a division bench of the High Court. The verdict was heard by a single High Court judge, and the case was adjourned. High Court of Appeal allowed in r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
