WAQAS AHMED SIDDIQUI versus THE STATE THROUGH CYBER CIRCLE FIA
Section 497 (2) Electronic Transaction Ordinance (LI of 2002), Guarantee of Section 37 Information System Damage, etc., delay of three months in filing further investigation grant FIR, no satisfactory statement, prosecution Was not free. After recording the evidence, it could not be ascertained whether the provisions of Article 37 of the Electronic Transactions Ordinance 2002 were attracted in this case, when the documentary material was to be proved in accordance with the law. As a question. Whether or not any objectionable material was uploaded to the Internet and whether any complaint-related email was sent by the accused to the complainant has not yet been determined. The forensic report was, without doubt, presented by an expert, but the trial court, in accordance with the law, has provided for section 37 of the Electronic Transactions Ordinance 2002, in the circumstances of the trial. Previously, a decision could not be made while the trial court temporarily reviewed the record and said that the evidence The said record cannot be deeply appreciated after the recording, but was to be temporarily examined, first to ascertain whether the accused was connected to the commission of the crime or involved in the present case. A decision cannot be made without a record, with the fact that there has been a delay in filing an FIR, further investigation into the matter is needed. In section 497 (2) of the section, the PC accused, under the circumstances, was admitted on bail
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
