Section 497 Preventive Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/324/34 morning trial, fine attempt at murder, joint intention to guarantee, denial of the accused was alleged that there was a blow to the leg of the complainant. The allegations that the defendant had been acquitted from the accomplices were that he had not been accused of causing any injury to the accused. It was alleged that the complainant suffered an injury to the leg, while the complainant's medical certificate revealed that there was only one injury to his head. That the recovery of the iron rod from the accused was not affected, and that the devil's liability to the accused will be determined in the case. The Valdetti Complainant specifically designated the suspect to hit his leg with an iron rod. The fact is that the complainant's medical certificate did this. Do not mention the injury to his leg as being irrelevant because sometimes there is no sign of trauma, friction and swelling and as there was no contradiction between the ocular version and the medical evidence, the defendant had no iron rod in his recovery. Will have no help. In the presence of ocular testimony which was in accordance with the medical certificate, the question about the accused's vicious liability should be determined by his conduct and the manner in which he was charged. The accused and the accomplices were alleged to have iron bars in their hands that indicate their general intention to fight, which eventually led to the death of the late, hence, provided under section 34, PPC. The shared intentions cannot be ignored. Wave away to believe the accused's involvement in the current crime
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
