MST. RASHIDA BEGUM versus THE STATE THROUGH ADVOCATE-GENERAL SINDH
Section 147/448 / 342/427/457/506 Criminal Code (v. 1898), Section 417 Unrest, misdemeanor home, wrongful imprisonment, misdemeanor that has resulted in loss of fifty rupees, to commit domestic crime or Breaking up at night. Appeals against being acquitted of guilt, guilty of criminal threats, dismissal of testimonial testimony were allegations against the defendants (defendants) that they entered the complainant's house and forcibly demolished him, They were later punished by the occupants. The house was illegally taken to another location illegally and forcibly, despite the complainant's disclosure that the court had pending litigation at home, the trial court found the accused (except those who were absconding). ) On the ground that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations. Reasonable doubt; that the complainant had filed an FIR against unknown persons, admitting that he could not identify the culprits due to darkness. The complainant, who was also a key witness to the prosecution, did not disclose the names of the culprits, nor did they determine the specific role of any of them, and that other witnesses were also involved in the identification of the accused. Failure to provide any positive evidence, which were fugitives, was placed on an invalid file Property complaints failed to read or not read the evidence, and any illegal or inaccurate form of interference with the guarantee of justice. Or the nature of the evidence for abortion demands that all the accused, including the accused, should be treated the same. The fugitive accused was also acquitted because of this
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
