HASSAN JAMEEL ANSARI versus NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU (NAB)
Sections 9 (a) (ix) (x), Schedule, Item 5 and (b) Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Section 497 (2) Constitution before arrest of Pakistan, Article 199, further investigation allowed. Proof of Documents Documentary Proof Applicants were named accused in a NAB-filed reference, alleging breach of trust, widespread deception of members of the public and loss of public exchequer up to Rs 64 billion. Was planted. He was not assigned a role and the entire case was based on documentary evidence, the fact of which will be determined at the trial stage is not sufficient to merely allege that a felony was committed. But such fights needed unbroken chains that led to crime. There was no direct charge. Apart from the litigation against the applicants, the entire charge went to the accompanying accused in the reference, as is evident from the record and no evidence was available for a direct assault on the applicants on the basis of legality and reasonable grounds. Convicted prosecutors will have the opportunity to grant a pre-arrest and pre-arrest warrant without direct evidence of the beneficiary or involved by presenting authentic evidence of liability for abuse of powers at trial. The role of the co-accused was higher than the applicants, who were already high The court granted bail, therefore, that the applicants were entitled to the same treatment on the issue of both immunity trials. Applicants further fall into the category of inquiry and they were entitled to bail
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
