Find a Lawyer

SHAMSUDDIN KHASKHELI versus NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU SINDH

Sections (a) and (b) constitution of Pakistan, Article Constitution 199 Constitution Constitutional application to guarantee corrupt and corrupt practices, denied evidence, the accused were employees of the Defensive Accounts Office who were accused of forging fake pensioners. The pension was paid and was due to damage to the government. They were allegedly involved in falsehood and they are innocent. A temporary review should be made for the purpose and the evidence cannot be deeply appreciated or evaluated. The High Court rejected any observation that could have led to prejudice in any of the parties to the case at trial. After the trial court wanted to consider by the evidence the accused failed to make further inquiry and was not entitled to be released on bail on the occasion.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012

• WAHEED AHMED v. IST ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SHIKARPUR 2012 YLR 2756
• Mst. RASHIDA BEGUM v. THE STATE through Advocate-General Sindh 2012 YLR 2770
• GHULAM SARWAR v. S.H.O. POLICE STATION, VEEHAR 2012 YLR 2775
• LIAQUAT KHAN v. State 2012 YLR 2779
• MUHAMMAD ZAHID v. State 2012 YLR 2790
• MUHAMMAD NAZEER v. State 2012 YLR 2797
• HAMEED v. State 2012 YLR 2804
• HASSAN JAMEEL ANSARI v. NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU (NAB) 2012 YLR 2809

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2012 →

how to become a advocate from Hangu lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes