Sections 497 and 103 of the Control of Narcotic Substance Act (XXV of 1997), section 9 (c) and possession of 25 intoxicants bail, police did not prove refusal for crime on political grounds and for political reasons. The non-attendant scope and co-accused were allegedly arrested with 4kg and 5kg of hashish (drugs) The accused and co-accused have been accused of police rioting and political riots. He was involved in the case for reasons. That the police knew in advance of the incident but did not share any private witness as a counselor and therefore committed a violation of Section 22 and Section 103 of the Drug Substances Act 1997, The accuracy of the PC was alleged and the co-accused failed to file an FIR. , Verdict or documentary evidence to prove that the accused and accomplices were arrested in broad daylight due to police enmity with their community or for political reasons and their names in the FIR Was mentioned and they were unsuccessful. In order to explain how such a large amount of drug paraphernalia could be eradicated by police section 103, the CRPC, it was not necessary in connection with drug addicts. CCP bail pleas of alleged offenders, suspects and accomplices allegedly violated under section 497 of the rehabilitation process were dismissed
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
