GHULAM SARWAR versus S.H.O. POLICE STATION, VEEHAR
The registration of the FIR sought by Articles 22A, 22B, 200 and 561 complainant (applicant) is not ready for the parties to accept the disputed terms. The accused (defendant) has been charged. That he had forcibly entered the complainant's shop and allegedly looted cash and mobile phones and removed the articles contained in the shop. The petition filed by the complainant before the Justice of Peace for the registration of the FIR was dismissed with the observation that the FIR had disclosed the names of the ten accused but the complainant in the court had only two accused. Designated and could not recall the rest, the claim was made by a witness who disclosed to the complainant that the material that was sitting in the shop was available, indicating that the complainant and the proposed accused have long been a station house officer (Sec. HO) have been on controversial issues with each other ever since. It was stated in plain words that there was no such incident or dispute between the complainant on the ground that the relationship was on a plot of land. The petition was rejected by the High Court with the observation that It would be appropriate for the complainant to file a private complaint before the competent jurisdiction court, where the complainant can produce evidence on his own and his complaint may be filed. Properly resolved \ r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
