Find a Lawyer

ABID ALIAS BAGOO BHATTI versus THE STATE

Section 2 (2 (b)) Evidence Defined The benefit of the suspect was allegedly recovered from a case property / single barrel gun, vacancy and live ammunition which was sent to the forensic science laboratory 18 months after its recovery. The counsel's statements contained contradictions. The litigation against the accused in connection with the charges and the sealing of bullets and seals was by no means free and the benefit of such doubt was given to the accused. Should have been, the accused had been acquitted on the benefit of the doubt, and had been ordered to be released, in Sir Cummins

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012

• MUHAMMAD NAZEER v. State 2012 YLR 2797
• HAMEED v. State 2012 YLR 2804
• HASSAN JAMEEL ANSARI v. NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU (NAB) 2012 YLR 2809
• GODHO alias MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE v. THE STATE 2012 YLR 2822
• SHAMS-UL-HAQ v. THE STATE 2012 YLR 2844
• MUHAMMAD SOHAIL MEMON v. THE STATE 2012 YLR 2849
• FAWWAD SHAFI v. State 2012 YLR 2859
• Mst. AZIZA v. SSP, DISTRICT TANDO MUHAMMAD KHAN 2012 YLR 2881

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2012 →

best advocate from Qasba Gujrat lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes