Sections 6 516A, 3?3 and Super 561A car were owned by the owner of a BuenaFeed buyer Remedy car complaint that the accused had arrested by fraud and fraud, on the FIR filed by the complainant. , Was taken into custody by another person, claiming to be a defective fraud buyer from the accused for valuable consideration. Against the complainant considering a sale of Rs 740,000, the accused had purchased the property from the disputant who had sold the vehicle to the applicant the next day, on which the sale of Rs 640 was, in a day, 150, This move by the accused himself, while maintaining a financial loss of Rs. 000 000et, had pointed out some wrongdoing and indicated that the issue so far in connection with the controversial car was so far the only complaint. The barrier to the seller was to allow the complainant to sell the same applicant, based on fraud and fraud, when purchased. Although he claimed to be the maximum purchaser of the dispute, he could not be trialled as a lawful owner; moreover, the applicant could seek legal recourse to recover his loss, if any. If so, the accused High Court directed the trial court to adjourn the case quickly and refused to interfere with the superdee order in favor of the complainant, the application was granted by the lower appellate court.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
