Section 369 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 506/448/148/149/511 Telegraph Act (XIII 1885), Section 29 Criminal Intimidation, Home Corruption, Unrest, Unlawful Assembly, Conviction of Crimes Efforts were filed for pre-arrest bail for offenses under section 506/448 / 148/149/511, PPC, and obtained an interim arrest warrant. During the proceedings it was affected that the accused did not mention the offense under section 29 of the Telegraph Act, 1885, in his plea, but he was included in the judicial record separately in hand and ink session court. Therefore, it was immediately directed to register a case under which the Sessions Court heard the petition of one of the respondents six months later on 16 1 2009. Accordingly, under the improper order dated 1 6 2009, the above order dated 16 1 2009 was withdrawn, which, under section 6969 Cr, after the signing of the decision of the PC, a court may amend or amend it. To remove any mistake, even the High Court had to attach its judicial record to the security review of the order and tampering with it was a disgusting offense under which to return the judicial order. The concept of summoning was beyond the Code of Criminal Procedure; the 1898 sitting court was not able to withdraw its first decree on 16 1, 2009; The order was set aside and a review request was accepted.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
