MUHAMMAD AZAM MALIK versus PAKISTAN ELECTION COMMISSION EMPLOYEES\' COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY, LIMITED, LAHORE
Section 43 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional application which was investigated under the Cooperative Society Act, 1925, came to the conclusion that the applicant had borrowed from the society and failed to repay it. On the basis of such inquiry, the Society was directed to recover the money from the applicant that the petitioner's appeal against the recovery order was dismissed The applicant's position was that he was neither involved in the inquiry proceedings nor He was given the opportunity to defend himself. And there was no documentary evidence on record to show that the applicant had borrowed the said amount from the Society's Inquiry Report funds and that the order for recovery was based on the records of the Society as well as the former members. The statements were also in line with being a member of the Managing Committee. In the relevant time, was responsible for rectifying any damages, the applicant did not deny that he had never taken advantage of the finance, but his position was that a contract in this regard would be for the society. The accounts were not on record and there were legitimate pieces of evidence. The entries were rightly relied upon by the Society Order in which the petitioner's appeal was dismissed on 2 8 2010 while the constitutional petition was filed on 27 4 2011, as the petition was more than six months away. Influenced the principle of law support. Neither cautious nor unforgivable applicant fails any illegal identification justifying the High Court's interference in the exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 19 of the Constitution.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
