Sections 12 and 27 (b) of Conan Evidence (10 of 1984), Article 79 without knowledge of the knowledge of the contract for selling the plaintiff in evidence for the specific performance of the contract to sell the sower feeder buyer. Specific performance was sought, before the sale proceedings were registered by the defendants that the plaintiff raised by the defendants that they were worthwhile consideration without knowledge of the agreement in favor of the defendants and The trial court dismissed the case because the plaintiff failed to prove the two men hanged. The sale agreement but the lower appellate court upheld the decision of the case in favor of the plaintiffs. If the document requires verification of documents, it should not be used as evidence until its execution. The two witnesses were not summoned for the purpose of doing so unless they essentially approved the sale agreement. The law must be certified by two witnesses but the plaintiff failed to meet the basic requirement of art. Constitution No. had 1984, Conan testimony, icle 1984 Defendants of Def. Defendants were good purchasers of the property and should have their There was no information about the execution of the sale agreement on behalf of the plaintiffs before the registered sale deed in favor. There was no evidence in relation to the defendants and the affirmative that the defendants knew the execution of the sale agreement in favor of the plaintiffs, and that the lower appellate court passed the verdict and injunction, saying Committed which had no effect in the High Court's view. Appeal Scope
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
