Find a Lawyer

SHEIKH NIAZ ANJUM versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, MINISTRY OF INTERIOR, ISLAMABAD

Section 2 Constitution Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Application Bank Defaults and Misappropriation of Mortgaged Stock Case The accused named in the High Court Examination Control List has been placed under the supervision of the High Court for Rs 140 million, therefore, it did not say. It is likely that the accused had misused the High Court's stock order and it also shows that there was no mention of misappropriation of the mortgaged stock in his plenum bank and it appears that the bank blackmail. Was trying to make sure that the authorities mistakenly entered the suspect's name into the Exit Control List, Was contrary to fundamental rights, the accused should have the right to travel abroad and the constitutional protection of their business and I was allowed to exit the control authorities the name of the suspect list

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012

• Maj. (Retd.) ANJUM SHAFIQUE v. State 2012 PCrLJ 1124
• Hafiz MUHAMMAD ALEEM v. LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY through Director-General, LDA 2012 CLD 1128
• MUHAMMAD BOOTA v. KHURSHID AKHTAR 2012 YLR 1129
• MUHAMMAD ARIF v. State 2012 MLD 1130
• ALI KULI AMIN-UD-DIN v. MUHAMMAD ZAFAR 2012 PCrLJ 1136
• MUHAMMAD ISMAIL v. SUI NORTHERN GASS PIPE LINES LTD. 2012 YLR 1136
• MUHAMMAD AZAM MALIK v. PAKISTAN ELECTION COMMISSION EMPLOYEES\' COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY, LIMITED, LAHORE 2012 CLC 1138
• MUHAMMAD YASIN v. Sheikh MUHAMMAD PERVAIZ 2012 CLC 1141

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2012 →

registration advocate from Sakrand lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes