A. XXXVII, R2 and 3 suits for receipt of money on the basis of the Pro Note The petitioner's request for leave to defend the decision of the suit after the dismissal of this petition was the plaintiff's request that under the provisions of R2 of OXVII It was not served. , CPC; and that his lawyer appeared on 19 12 2007, but the court did not warn him that it was the last day to file a leave application, but rather to submit a Power of Attorney and written statement. The action was postponed. Form IV, Annex B contains neither the copy of the plaintiff nor the copy of the claimant with which to issue the summons in Form IV and the actual amount is reflected, in the interest and the cost to the party in law There will be a closer defense of its rights. The delay in filing a petition for leave under the special provisions of the law cannot be delayed or the default can be attributed to the defendant, unless it is notified in the required legal manner and in such a manner as the trial court has 19 12 2007 The plaintiff's copy was not given to To file a leave application, the action was postponed to 10 1 2008 for filing a written statement. 10 1 200 Submitting a Holiday Request. 8 could not be said to be time-barred due to his negligence, but rather he was subjected to trial court proceedings that could not meet the requirements of the law while also issuing summons to the defendant alone. Penalties could not be encountered. Controversial ruling in the trial case is in the eyes of the law, the trial court did not exercise its jurisdiction in accordance with the law, the High Court upheld the disqualification order.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
