The accused accused of supplying the military officers of Article 9 549 Pakistan Army Act (XXXI of 19522), Section 44 Penn Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Article 302/109 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition. The case can be heard. In view of the warnings sent by the authorized authority, the Sessions Court was set aside when the court indicated its intention to prosecute it through martial validity and, when an army official had committed a civil offense, Reference must be made to the court under 54 549 for trial. The CCP, which reads with section 94 of the Pakistan Army Act 1952, and if the Presiding Officer had consulted with the court martial about institutional proceedings, the ordinary criminal court would not be eligible to try such an army. The reference sent to the trial court was legal, meaning section 495 of the compulsion, the PC read with section 94 of the Pakistan Army Act 1952, and in the wake of the prescription decision, the applicants filed a constitutional petition against them. Apart from the hearing, he had no power and accordingly was excluded.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
