MIAN MUHAMMAD MUZAFFAR versus MEMBER BOARD OF REVENUE/ CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, PUNJAB
Sections 2 and 3 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional application for transfer of property vacated in the dispute were placed in the Department of Settlement and Rehabilitation Architecture Scheme and by a female association deed to identify the nephew associated with his nephew. I succeeded and surrendered to all. PTD was issued in favor of this and for that, later, the Department of Agriculture identified a part of the said house on a separate number and made it available for auction, saying that The proceedings challenged the aforementioned transfer, and finally the Supreme Court accepted the transfer claim and the disputed portion was reinstated in its favor. The Executive District Officer (Revenue) / Notified Officer recommended, through an invalid order, the entire house. Transfer should be issued in favor of transfer successors. Referring to the question raised by the parties after hearing from the parties' informed officer after spot inspection and scrutiny by professionals, the question of maximum area measurement in this case Was set in a very comprehensive way. And in order to transfer the transfer order in favor of the transfer of the house rightly recommended that in the absence of any reason, the facts recorded by the notified officer could not be interfered with by the High Court, the constitutional petition in the constitutional petition was dismissed. Done
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
