OV, R 21, O XXXVII, RR 2 and 3 Litigation Act (IX of 1908), Section 5 and Article 156 checks suit for receipt of money, based on a check residing in the jurisdiction of another court Delay in filing the petition, his contempt plaintiff voluntarily appeared before the Duty Judge on 7 8 2010 and 24 8 2010 and dismissed the leave application on 29 2010, which resulted in a ban. The request for was deleted. The accuracy record shows that the defendant was issued no general summons in terms of OV, R 21. , CPC is neither an alternative to the law nor requires summons in Appendix B's Form 4, Plaintiff's copy with the CPC is obliged to issue the summons to the defendant in Form 4 and his It has also been reported that it has set a near term. If the court gets leave to defend the case, the right to defend it will be terminated. The order to hand over a copy of the case to the plaintiff or against him was approved, which was a major reason for the trial court's submission of leave under the trial, if the trial court granted leave When the plaintiff was alerted after handing over the copy of the plaintiff to the filing, the position was completely violated by the different trial court's basic provisions of the law only in case of negligence of assistance under the Court Act. Convictions cannot be faced or anyone leaving court will suffer harassment or prejudice. Submission of leave application on 29 2010. Not just because of the negligence of the defendants, but because they were subjected to the Act of Court,
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
